olymmath

FI-MO 2009 Problem 4

    We say that the set of step lengths D⊂Z+={1,2,…}D\subset \mathbb{Z}_+=\{1,2,\ldots\} is excellent if it has the following property: If we split the set of integers into two subsets AA and Z∖A\mathbb{Z}\setminus{A} , at least other set contains element a−d,a,a+da-d,a,a+d (i.e. {a−d,a,a+d}⊂A\{a-d,a,a+d\} \subset A or {a−d,a,a+d}∈Z∖A\{a-d,a,a+d\}\in \mathbb{Z}\setminus A from some integer a∈Z,d∈Da\in \mathbb{Z},d\in D .) For example the set of one element {1}\{1\} is not excellent as the set of integer can be split into even and odd numbers, and neither of these contains three consecutive integer. Show that the set {1,2,3,4}\{1,2,3,4\} is excellent but it has no proper subset which is excellent.

    Dataset text AI-MO AoPS. Quoted with source.

    Solutions

    No solution is on olymmath yet. Official and human solutions come first when they arrive. AI solutions come after them, with a label.

    Add a solution

    Similar problems

    These problems have the most words in common with this statement.

    Locator fi-mo/2009/p4 · Tag G8E1DN0PVY · Edit this page on GitHub · Keys: j next, k previous