Find the least positive integer n for which there exists a set {s1,s2,…,sn} consisting of n distinct positive integers such that (1−s11)(1−s21)…(1−sn1)=201051 N1′. Same as Problem N1, but the constant 201051 is replaced by 201042. (Canada) Answer for Problem N1. n=39. Solution for Problem N1. Suppose that for some n there exist the desired numbers; we may assume that s1<s2<⋯<sn. Surely s1>1 since otherwise 1−s11=0. So we have 2≤s1≤s2−1≤⋯≤sn−(n−1), hence si≥i+1 for each i=1,…,n. Therefore 201051=(1−s11)(1−s21)…(1−sn1)≥(1−21)(1−31)…(1−n+11)=21⋅32⋯n+1n=n+11 which implies n+1≥512010=17670>39 so n≥39. Now we are left to show that n=39 fits. Consider the set {2,3,…,33,35,36,…,40,67} which contains exactly 39 numbers. We have 21⋅32⋯3332⋅3534⋯4039⋅6766=331⋅4034⋅6766=67017=201051 hence for n=39 there exists a desired example. Comment. One can show that the example (1) is unique. Answer for Problem N1' ′n=48. Solution for Problem N1'. Suppose that for some n there exist the desired numbers. In the same way we obtain that si≥i+1. Moreover, since the denominator of the fraction 201042=3357 is divisible by 67 , some of si 's should be divisible by 67 , so sn≥si≥67. This means that 201042≥21⋅32⋯nn−1⋅(1−671)=67n66 which implies n≥42⋅672010⋅66=7330>47 so n≥48. Now we are left to show that n=48 fits. Consider the set {2,3,…,33,36,37,…,50,67} which contains exactly 48 numbers. We have 21⋅32⋯3332⋅3635⋯5049⋅6766=331⋅5035⋅6766=3357=201042 hence for n=48 there exists a desired example. Comment 1. In this version of the problem, the estimate needs one more step, hence it is a bit harder. On the other hand, the example in this version is not unique. Another example is 21⋅32⋯4746⋅6766⋅330329=671⋅33066⋅47329=67⋅57=201042. Comment 2. N1' was the Proposer's formulation of the problem. We propose N1 according to the number of current IMO.